Understanding Control, Energy, and Electrical Architecture

A Kraken Power Technical White Paper


Foreword & Glossary of Terms

Modern fire apparatus electrical systems are becoming increasingly complex. Terms such as multiplexingonboard poweridle reduction, and energy management are often used interchangeably in industry discussions, specifications, and marketing materials—despite referring to fundamentally different systems.

This white paper is intended to clarify these distinctions and provide an educational framework for understanding complete fire apparatus electrical system design, including energy generation, storage, distribution, control, and safety.

Glossary (NFPA 1900–aligned where applicable)


Executive Summary

Fire apparatus multiplexing has become increasingly common over the past decade and is now standardized at many OEMs. At the same time, onboard electrical loads have grown significantly—often exceeding what traditional starter-battery-centric electrical architectures were designed to support.

This paper explains:

The goal is not to replace existing architectures, but to clarify roles, reduce confusion, and support better long-term reliability and safety.


1. Evolution of Fire Apparatus Electrical Systems

1.1 Traditional Architectures

Historically, most fire apparatus in North America have relied on:

These designs were driven by reliability, simplicity, and available technology at the time.


1.2 Emergence of Multiplexing

Over the past 10–15 years, multiplexing systems have been adopted to address:

Multiplexing represents a control innovation, not an energy innovation.


2. What Is Multiplexing?

Multiplexing is a distributed electrical control system.

What multiplexing does well:

Multiplexing systems excel at controlling what turns on and off throughout the vehicle.


3. What Multiplexing Does Not Do

Multiplexing systems are often misunderstood as “the electrical system,” but they are not responsible for:

Multiplexing assumes that power is already available.


4. Alternators, Starter Batteries, and the Real Electrical Challenge

Fire apparatus alternators are often generously sized—commonly 400–600 A—primarily to:

This is appropriate and intentional.

However, without appropriate energy storage architecture, much of this alternator capability is underutilized or wasted.


5. Battery Chemistry and Charge Acceptance

Charge Acceptance vs State of Charge (SoC)

Lead-acid starter batteries:

Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries:


6. Starter-Only vs House-Bank Electrical Architecture

Energy Flow Comparison

Starter-Only Architecture (Common Today)

Result: high stress, shortened battery life, unpredictable endurance.


Separated Starter + House Bank Architecture (Kraken Power Model)

Result: improved reliability, predictable electrical capacity, reduced maintenance.


7. Idle Reduction: A Feature, Not a System

Idle reduction strategies are often discussed as electrical solutions. However:

When combined with lead-acid-only architectures, idle reduction can exacerbate battery undercharging and premature failure.

Idle reduction should be evaluated only in the context of the complete electrical and energy storage architecture.


8. Kraken Power: The Electrical Grid of the Apparatus

Kraken Power onboard systems address a different discipline than multiplexing:

Kraken Power does not replace multiplexing.
It feeds and supports it.


9. Electrical Distribution vs Electrical Control

DisciplinePurpose
Power SystemsGenerate, store, and distribute energy safely
MultiplexingControl and actuate loads throughout the vehicle

They interact—but they are not interchangeable.


10. Why Confusion Exists in the Market

This leads to incomplete or stressed system designs.


11. A Holistic Framework for Modern Fire Apparatus Electrical Design

A complete electrical system specification should independently address:

  1. Energy generation & recovery
  2. Energy storage (chemistry & capacity)
  3. Electrical distribution & protection
  4. Electrical control & actuation

Each is necessary. None replaces the others.


12. Conclusion

Multiplexing remains a valuable and necessary technology for modern fire apparatus. At the same time, onboard power systems address a fundamentally different challenge—how electrical energy is generated, stored, protected, and delivered.

Understanding the distinction enables:

Kraken Power systems are designed to work alongside existing multiplex architectures, forming the electrical backbone that modern fire apparatus increasingly require.


© Kraken Power — Educational Technical White Paper